Sadoun Customer Service & Order Hotline: 1-888-519-9595

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: HughesNet or WildBlue, considerations before buying

  1. #1
    New Member Newbie UGLandrum is on a distinguished road UGLandrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008

    Location
    NorthEast Texas
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    0

    HughesNet or WildBlue, considerations before buying

    I did my research before I chose and I am really happy with my choice.
    If someone tells you WildBlue is the best, they are mistaken and they need to read this page at HughesNet's page. I post this on this thread solely because I want folks to know that they can get more and better satellite internet services for their money!
    I cannot stress enough, that these comparisons are completely factual and not just a ploy to get more customers, I've found HughesNet to be the best all around service in North America, while I don't have the service yet, my facts are from research and personal testimonies from fmaily and friends that have the service. I am merly waiting to move where I will have no access to landlines, I am milking this wonderful cable internet! lol
    But I have made my desicion as to what I will have as Internet service when I move to the boonies (at least 10 miles away from the nearist fiber-optic lines). Please check out this page, you'll be happy you did. HughesNet Satellite Internet, vs. WildBlue Internet, High Speed Internet


    Regards- Will

  2. #2
    Senior Member Rising Star Corey is on a distinguished road Corey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Posts
    110
    Rep Power
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by UGLandrum View Post
    I did my research before I chose and I am really happy with my choice.
    If someone tells you WildBlue is the best, they are mistaken and they need to read this page at HughesNet's page. I post this on this thread solely because I want folks to know that they can get more and better satellite internet services for their money!
    I cannot stress enough, that these comparisons are completely factual and not just a ploy to get more customers, I've found HughesNet to be the best all around service in North America, while I don't have the service yet, my facts are from research and personal testimonies from fmaily and friends that have the service. I am merly waiting to move where I will have no access to landlines, I am milking this wonderful cable internet! lol
    But I have made my desicion as to what I will have as Internet service when I move to the boonies (at least 10 miles away from the nearist fiber-optic lines). Please check out this page, you'll be happy you did. HughesNet Satellite Internet, vs. WildBlue Internet, High Speed Internet


    Regards- Will
    With any satellite Internet service, you're going to get very long ping/latency times, compared to a terrestrial service such as DSL, cable, or fiber optic lines. This is at least partially because the speed of light limits how fast your data can make a round trip of 44,000 miles to and from the satellite. To take the case of an Internet ping, it must make this trip twice: the ping is sent to the satellite and bounced back to a receiving station, where it is forwarded to the Internet. Eventually the ping reply comes back to the receiving station, and is sent up to the satellite and back down to your machine. A total of 88,000 miles. At the very minimum, you will see ping times on the order of 500ms. And that's assuming the Internet has 0 latency, and that there's little contention for bandwidth on the satellite. A more realistic ping would probably be in the 600-700ms range. Long latency times are considered bad for MMO games. You might look around for Internet service that's provided via long-distance WiFi. I think those can go up to 10 miles, but I'm not sure. In any case, good luck.
    Fortec 90 dish, SM3D22 motor
    Standard 0.4db LNBF, Twinhan 102g receiver
    Kaffeine and MythTV software on a 3GHz P4 w/NVidia graphics card

  3. #3
    Member Super Newbie N4ST is on a distinguished road N4ST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006

    Location
    Jersey, VA
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Corey View Post
    With any satellite Internet service, you're going to get very long ping/latency times, compared to a terrestrial service such as DSL, cable, or fiber optic lines. <snip> A more realistic ping would probably be in the 600-700ms range. <snip>
    Sadly, satellite internet services such as WildBlue, typically implement DAMA (Demand Assigned Multiple Access) which results in ping times of 1100-1200ms when there is no channel contention issues (yes, it gets even worse). VOIP, VPN and twitch gaming are just not worth it and even https sites are noticeably slower.
    Last edited by N4ST; 02-15-2008 at 08:25 PM.

  4. #4
    Member Super Newbie N4ST is on a distinguished road N4ST's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006

    Location
    Jersey, VA
    Posts
    49
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by UGLandrum View Post
    I did my research before I chose and I am really happy with my choice.
    If someone tells you WildBlue is the best, they are mistaken and they need to read this page at HughesNet's page.
    Well, that all depends on your usage and needs. The provided link contains old information and a few errors about WildBlue's service. It also presents things in the worst possible context for WildBlue. Following a similar logic I could truthfully say something like, "I can download a 640MB Linux CD in less than 1-hour on my WildBlue system and that could take over 9-hours to do as a continuous download on Hughesnet because of their quick FAP. And that's +9-hours if you used their $79.99/mon ProPlus Package. It would take twice that long with their Home package."

    I've been using WildBlue for over 26 months with no equipment failures or service calls. Running between 3 and 6 computers off the router, depending on how many kids are home from college. It works fine for me.

    But please... Don't put me in the position of defending or promoting any satellite ISP. Superior only to dial-up, and not in all aspects.

  5. #5
    New Member Newbie UGLandrum is on a distinguished road UGLandrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008

    Location
    NorthEast Texas
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    0
    Well I see your point N4ST but, I guess I was thinking that getting your service turned down slower for up to a month was not what I wanted to deal with, Huges I guess is more tailored to my needs. I do not download huge files and strongly am against downloading music (because of shady laws and guidelines on downloading polocies and I'm certainly not going to pay for them with my credit card!) I figure Hughes FAP is better for me.

    Has anyone heard of ClearWire internet service, this service involves you going and buying a s-band device that accesses the satellite signal much like XM radio or GPS, then just hooking it up and you get service all for $20 a month. My neighbor told me she gets 100mbps.

    - Will

  6. #6
    Senior Member Rising Star Corey is on a distinguished road Corey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Posts
    110
    Rep Power
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by UGLandrum View Post
    Has anyone heard of ClearWire internet service, this service involves you going and buying a s-band device that accesses the satellite signal much like XM radio or GPS, then just hooking it up and you get service all for $20 a month. My neighbor told me she gets 100mbps.
    I'd seriously doubt 100Mpbs. That's probably the link speed she's getting to the clearwire modem, which is not where the bottleneck is. You can check out the specs at Clearwire: Wireless Broadband Internet Service Home and Office. They claim 2.0Mbps down, and 256kbps up. Also, it's not a satellite service, but more like WiMax.. they use towers to transmit and receive the signals.

    If you have access to that service, though, that would be a good solution, I think, for gaming and general Internet usage. The rates they quote appear to be higher than $20/month, but I could not check the details since I didn't have an address to check in their coverage area. $20/month would be an excellent price.
    Last edited by Corey; 02-25-2008 at 02:36 AM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rising Star Muad'Dib will become famous soon enough Muad'Dib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Posts
    128
    Rep Power
    99
    100mbps via sat is impossible yet.
    *german citizen behind the horizon*

  8. #8
    New Member Newbie UGLandrum is on a distinguished road UGLandrum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008

    Location
    NorthEast Texas
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    0
    I apologize, my sources were completely wrong! Ive been trying to hook up and retrofit a system that can utilize my Primestar dish, homebrew cantenna, Sat. motor and Fortec receiver. I angled the dish at 2 digree adove horizon, took a pipe for an adaptor and mounted the dish to the motor, positioned it as not to change the elevation. Hooked up the receiver to a small TV next to the computer and programed in Sat locations for the WiFi towers. Worked great! FREE INTERNET ACCESS.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Rising Star Corey is on a distinguished road Corey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Posts
    110
    Rep Power
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by UGLandrum View Post
    I apologize, my sources were completely wrong! Ive been trying to hook up and retrofit a system that can utilize my Primestar dish, homebrew cantenna, Sat. motor and Fortec receiver. I angled the dish at 2 digree adove horizon, took a pipe for an adaptor and mounted the dish to the motor, positioned it as not to change the elevation. Hooked up the receiver to a small TV next to the computer and programed in Sat locations for the WiFi towers. Worked great! FREE INTERNET ACCESS.
    That's great! Could you post a picture of your setup? I'd love to see it, and I think a few others would too.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Rising Star ayelvington will become famous soon enough ayelvington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007

    Location
    Russell, PA
    Posts
    128
    Rep Power
    108

    It's what meets your requirements

    Quote Originally Posted by N4ST View Post
    Well, that all depends on your usage and needs. The provided link contains old information and a few errors about WildBlue's service. It also presents things in the worst possible context for WildBlue. Following a similar logic I could truthfully say something like, "I can download a 640MB Linux CD in less than 1-hour on my WildBlue system and that could take over 9-hours to do as a continuous download on Hughesnet because of their quick FAP. And that's +9-hours if you used their $79.99/mon ProPlus Package. It would take twice that long with their Home package."

    I've been using WildBlue for over 26 months with no equipment failures or service calls. Running between 3 and 6 computers off the router, depending on how many kids are home from college. It works fine for me.

    But please... Don't put me in the position of defending or promoting any satellite ISP. Superior only to dial-up, and not in all aspects.
    I agree with N4ST. I also looked into Hughes against WildBlue and went with WB. Both had their detractors and advocates, but it was both a financial and technical decision. I'm running a multi-machine SOHO LAN and am content with the service. I went with the $79 package for download so that multiple users did experience too much congestion. Our usage has stayed just under the fair-access-policy, so no problems there. I did not install their "optimizer" software, and I've not had any trouble.

    Both have good products tailored to their users. As long as you base your decision on what you expect, you'll probably do fine. Going into a satellite solution knowing that ping time is a fact of life is always a good thing.
    Move to Russell, PA in a valley against the west wall

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. HughesNet
    By grubbyboy in forum RV Satellite Internet Radio
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-01-2008, 10:19 AM
  2. sathawk3000 and Hughesnet?
    By grubbyboy in forum SatHawk Meters
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-17-2007, 12:01 PM
  3. My buying experience with Sadoun
    By mariam in forum Sadoun Website
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 01-16-2007, 01:19 PM
  4. Think about buying new system
    By blue eyes in forum FAQ - New users questions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-31-2006, 03:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0