Quote:
Originally Posted by mreaves53
The Mercury II is in a cabinet with my Motorola DSR 922 and the HDD 200. The HDD 200 produces a tremendous amount of heat,even off, compared to the 922. I was just wondering if I could cut down on the heat issue, possible stave off damage to the Mercury II and save on electricity at the same time. It would be scary to determine how much electricity we now pay for to keep equipment on standby for remote controls.
Thanks,
|
Boy that's the truth. I have several computers with their peripherals like printers, scanners and network switches and routers, 4 TIVOs, and 8 sat receivers that run 24/7, and a couple TVs, audio receivers, DAT recorder, DVD player, CD-player, and a Roku, which stay in standby, like you say, waiting for a remote to turn them on. Also, I have multiple devices running off wall wart DC supplies, that are using power even when not in use. I'm thinking that I could probably cut my power bill in half or perhaps even better than that, if I'd find a way to turn these things off when not in use.
One of my TVs is an old type that doesn't use a remote, and I have it hooked up via X10 switches, which is nice. I'd do that with more of my devices, except that some of these new computerized devices take a long time to boot up. The new DirecTV receivers for example, particularly those with a built in TIVO take a LONG time to boot up, something like about 5 minutes, so they have made that extremely inconvenient to turn off. Some lose their clock when they lose power. Another thing making it difficult to turn things off is that some of my equipment has to be turned on in a specific sequence, or it won't work right. For example, my computer downstairs has to be turned on, and a server started up before my Roku is turned on, or else the Roku won't find the music server running on the computer, and also the network switches have to be powered as well.
Right now, we users seem a bit powerless to deal with this, without losing much of the convenient features we paid for, but it should have been possible for the equipment manufacturers to design these things so that they use minimal power when not being used. Perhaps in the future, we'll see a "green rating" or something like that on these things, which will give buyers an idea of how energy efficient they are.
I have two stacks of A/V equipment, one free standing, but the other one is in a cabinet, and I used to have some heat issues with certain items. My TIVOs for example generate a LOT of heat, as does my Roku. I've found that I could control the temperature inside the cabinet a bit by separating those heat generating items. Ie the Roku is sensitive to heat, so I keep it away from my TIVOs, and have it elevated with 1" squares of wood under it's feet to give it more ventilation. My audio receiver also used to automatically turn on the DAT recorder and CD player whenever it was turned on, so I disabled that "feature". Anyway, now, my cabinet is pretty cool.