Thread: c-Ku
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:11 AM
wejones's Avatar
wejones wejones is offline
Cranky Crumudgeon
Expert
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MAINE
Posts: 2,755
Rep Power: 471
wejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by elgemcdlf View Post
I guess the whole thing comes down to the definition of the relative phrase "works quite well". Works quite well compared to ? A .5m dish? I would imagine so. A 12' dish I imagine not. .....
Right. And also works quite well with what source. Ie you don't see video sent by S band over relatively low power satellites spaced 2 degrees apart, and there is a good reason for that. If there were only 2 or 3 C-band sats up there transmitting at twice the power, then yes, you could probably get some reception with a 3' dish. Almost any size dish will "work" with C band, but if you're talking about video reception from conus satellites, "work" has a different meaning.

Like you say, no fancy math required. When C-band is compared to Ku, the gain is about 9 db less, and the beamwidth is about 3 times wider, both of which mean you need a bigger dish.
__________________
Bill in Maine

Sadoun has censored my signature for no good reason, which is annoying.
Reply With Quote