View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:19 AM
wejones's Avatar
wejones wejones is offline
Cranky Crumudgeon
Expert
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MAINE
Posts: 2,755
Rep Power: 471
wejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cincy View Post
Yeah - I know the basics of it having to be on the shaft and not touching the angle at the top, and the aspect of it being centered rotationally on the shaft. I think my Weingard 30" had a hole which aligned with the shaft but the Fortec 36" dish I replaced it with doesn't.

I remember that in one thread either here or in another forum someone pointed out it shouldn't matter but said that the closer to the end of the shaft (in this case the bottom) is better because it "...increases the sensitivity..." because it has more 'swing length' per degree of arc.
Well I'm not sure what post you're referring to, but the position on the shaft has absolutely no affect with respect to increasing the sensitivity, nor is there any affect relative to swing length per degree of arc. I *THINK* I understand where this might be coming from, because different positioning of the dish CAN give more movement of the dish per degree, however for there to be an improvement in resolution (which I think is what is really being referred to here), you need there to be more motor clicks per degree of arc, and when you have a dish hard connected to the motor shaft, you still have exactly the same number of motor increments per degree, so even though some dish positions may appear to produce more motion, there is no difference when it comes to what you see on your receiver.

Now, back to the holes on the shaft and the 36" dish. It is not the DISH that has to align with the holes, it is the dish mount. I have the Fortec 36" dish, and the mount I'm using uses the upper hole on the SG2100 motor shaft, and it aligns perfectly. I think the key here is what mount have you chosen? I'm using the pole mount option, and other people have used the U-bolt option. I can guarantee that the pole mount matches perfectly with the SG2100 that Sadoun sells, but I can't say the same for the U-bolt version.

THe other variable is the fact that there are more than one version of the SG2100, ie the one sold by Sadoun, and at least one other version made by competitors. Both look identical, however they are different. Not only are the motors different, but the motor shafts can be different. I have seen motor shafts with no holes, just one set of holes, and I think holes that aren't even centered in the shaft, in pictures I've encountered on the web.
__________________
Bill in Maine

Sadoun has censored my signature for no good reason, which is annoying.
Reply With Quote