View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2005, 07:28 PM
wejones's Avatar
wejones wejones is offline
Cranky Crumudgeon
Expert
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MAINE
Posts: 2,755
Rep Power: 476
wejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to beholdwejones is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by videobruce
I believe the proper term is beamwidth, not resolution.
Sounds as you are talking about video resolution e.g. number of lines. :mozilla_wink:

I wished I knew which satellites/transponders are on the border line where the larger dish would help. #-o
I used the term resolution because some of the equations I used to calculate it come from radio astronomy, where they are trying to resolve signals between 2 stars or something, which is analogous to resolving signals from two adjacent satellites.
Re predicting what signals you'd have problems with, I don't know, other than looking at Lyngsat. It's not that common, but I've seen problems a couple times on C-band with my 10' dish, which is similar to the 3' dish on Ku. Had to move the dish slightly off center to get one channel to come in, because there was a signal on the adjacent sat with nearly the same parameters. You probably won't have any problem with most signals with the smaller dish, but it is another reason that bigger is better.
Reply With Quote