View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2005, 02:50 PM
bobkat's Avatar
bobkat bobkat is offline
Moderator
ModeratorExpert
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,704
Rep Power: 474
bobkat has a spectacular aura aboutbobkat has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill_MacClarence
So, if I can't get the specific transponder that has the identifier beacon (there's not one on each transponder), then the only way to use the Sathawk is to bump up dish size or use a low noise envelope LNB. Correct? However, I'm still confused as to why I wouldn't receive all transponders equally. The footprint for AMC4 in Lyngsat is the same for all of them.
You use the Sathawk but just maximize signal strength on whatever transponder it "finds"; theoretically all the transponders should be maximized as well. Having said that, you have to watch out if you maximize strength on HOR - because sometimes the VER transponders will be weak. That's why with my Birdog I always find the satellite and then tweak the dish on say, HOR. Then I switch over to VER and make sure the signal is solid. If it isn't I re-tweak the dish on VER and then verify the HOR - its sort of a trade-off to get decent signal on both polarities. Of course, with my Birdog only identifying HOR on AMC 4 I'm flying blind because I can't verify the VER strengths until I get into the house and check with the receiver. Luckily I have had good signal strengths on both polarities. I really should update my Birdogs. #-o

As for individual transponders, yes, some of them are weaker than others - the footprint I think indicates an overall strength for the entire KU spectrum

kat
__________________
For as much as I like to help out our members I simply do not have time to answer Private Messages or emails asking about setup and other general issues. Please post your questions in the forums and we will try to help you out. Thanks.
Reply With Quote